Here is to you, mindless morons..
Saturday, August 18, 2012
To you, morons!
When I saw this, I immediately thought of a band of sycophantic stooges who spend their lives bitching (with apologies to dams) and moaning. What a waste of oxygen.
Here is to you, mindless morons..
Here is to you, mindless morons..
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Break stick?
There is this mosquito, or is it a troll, that keeps buzzing in my ear... its latest inquiry is whether I have a break stick or not. Apparently, not only is it a nuisance, it is also ignorant. This is unfortunate... a mere 10 minutes reading a posting on this blog would have assured it that its poodle's life would be spared if my dog got hold of it. Oh, wait... that can NEVER happen, because my dogs don't make choices. I do.But those of you who missed my post about three years ago, can get proper instruction on American Pit Bull Terrier ownership by reading my "primer."
http://andrew-rozsa.blogspot.com/2009/06/andrews-primer-for-having-american-pit.html
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Heroes or foes? YOU decide
In his inimitable and useless endeavor to convince me that Pit Bulls are bad, my foe (DubV) points me to this utterly useless piece of YouTube propaganda that uses fabricated numbers to pursuade you. Viewed by a total of 23 people. :-P
 |
| GOOD DOG DOWN Four-year-old "Chief", an American Pit Bull Terrier, dashed in front of a venomous snake which was poised to strike at 87-year-old Liberata la Victoria and her granddaughter Maria Victoria. Shielding the women from the attack, Chief saved them but died minutes later from the snake's bite.(Photo: Marc Sabelita) |
So DubV and his 2 friends, who don’t have a life, will bring “talking in circles”
type evidence (a.k.a. hearsay cherry-picked, culled from the media, unreliable,
pulled-out-of-the-thin-air, b.s pseudo-data).
The lovely threesome will ignore the testimony, personal
experiences and documented data supported by all major associations and
agencies (such as the American Medical Veterinary Association, The Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, American Canine Foundation, the National Animal
Control Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals),
opinion of experts, and the love of hundreds of thousands of Pit Bull lovers (the
mindless trio and their army of 23 cohorts call us “pitbull nutters”), and
continue to spew propaganda, while citing Goebel’s philosophy of it… how
hilariously ironic… or is it hypocritical?
But I digress…
So, on a lark, I entered the keywords “Pit Bull Saves”… got
683 hits… the “PitBull DSaves”.. got 663 hits…
Some interesting links:
Pit
Bull SAVES family from house fire
Blue,
the dog (Pit bull) wo (sic!) saved my son's life.
Pitbull
saves pregnant woman and child!
Pit
Bull killed protecting her family
Pit
Bull scares away molester
Pit
saves family from Cobra
A
Virginia Beach Pit Bull Is Being Called A Hero
Thank you, DubV, for being cannon fodder...
Monday, January 9, 2012
Talking about "unholy alliances"...
My foe, DubV, once again pours
water on a duck’s ass and “alerts” me to yet another masterpiece of foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric. This time an “article” written
by Branwyne Finch, a self-proclaimed “expert” and “contributor” to the blogs of
two ladies whose life-goals are to kill dogs.
I have no idea who Branwyne Finch is, what are
his qualifications, or whether anything about what he writes has any value. Is
he a geneticist? An animal behaviorist? A sociologist? A veterinarian? Or is he a self-serving mouthpiece
for two women who have nothing better to do with their lives than to denigrate
an entire dog breed?
Finch writes well; however he
self-references exclusively the blogs written by these two ladies and this puts
a serious dent in his credibility. Given that these blogs are read ONLY by folks
who are already convinced by the righteousness of their “cause,” he is “preaching
to the choir.” He sounds convincing and reasonable, however, the numbers he is “citing”
are pulled out of thin air and the arguments he uses are exactly of the same
caliber as those used by “pit nutters” (as these people, globally, call us).
At some point in his diatribe,
Finch states “It has become increasingly
apparent that a relatively small but vocal group of people who are fanciers of
dangerous dog breeds have managed to form an unholy alliance with the dog
breeder lobby and animal welfare organizations to ensure that the breeding and ownership
of dangerous dogs goes completely unregulated.”
I wish Mr. Finch did not lump
all of us together. MY cadre of Pit Bull fanciers has little tolerance for
backyard Pit Bull breeders or breeders in general. We are definitely NOT
aligned with any organizations that promote “the breeding and ownership of
dangerous dogs.” We loathe criminal behavior and cringe at the thought of dogs fighting
each other. In
fact, what Mr. Finch wishes for (i.e., “a call for cracking down on criminals and backyard breeders
producing the glut of unstable dogs, a call for breed clubs to redefine ethical
breeding practices, and a strong commitment to breeding away from the
aggressive behavior, including dog aggression that defines the pit bull breed”) is EXACTLY the focus of our endeavors.
Mr. Finch’s statement that Pit Bull fanciers promote unregulated
ownership of dangerous dogs is patently false. What we want is a distinction
between a “dangerous dog” and Pit Bulls. In his mind and in those of his cult,
the two are synonymous.
What Finch purposely misstates is that we are a “relatively
small” group. Actually, there are tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of us who
are rational, thoughtful, socially responsible, and kind human beings who just
happen to love a dog that gives us and our families much pleasure and improves
the quality of our lives.
Probably much to his surprise,
we (genuine Pit Bull fanciers) completely agree with Finch’s conclusions. Those
of us who work to rescue Pit Bulls and advocate responsible ownership will automatically
spay and neuter the dogs and will foster and re-home only those dogs that are
animal and human friendly. Demanding
dogs are paired with experienced handlers and placed in families that are
appropriate for the dog. The gauntlet of tests and the level of scrutiny through
which prospective adopters AND the dogs have to pass is probably matched only
by the FBI applicants.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)