In his inimitable and useless endeavor to convince me that Pit Bulls are bad, my foe (DubV) points me to this utterly useless piece of YouTube propaganda that uses fabricated numbers to pursuade you. Viewed by a total of 23 people. :-P

GOOD DOG DOWN
Four-year-old "Chief", an American Pit Bull Terrier, dashed in front of a venomous snake which was poised to strike at 87-year-old Liberata la Victoria and her granddaughter Maria Victoria. Shielding the women from the attack, Chief saved them but died minutes later from the snake's bite.(Photo: Marc Sabelita)

So DubV and his 2 friends, who don’t have a life, will bring “talking in circles” type evidence (a.k.a. hearsay cherry-picked, culled from the media, unreliable, pulled-out-of-the-thin-air, b.s pseudo-data).

The lovely threesome will ignore the testimony, personal experiences and documented data supported by all major associations and agencies (such as the American Medical Veterinary Association, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Canine Foundation, the National Animal Control Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), opinion of experts, and the love of hundreds of thousands of Pit Bull lovers (the mindless trio and their army of 23 cohorts call us “pitbull nutters”), and continue to spew propaganda, while citing Goebel’s philosophy of it… how hilariously ironic… or is it hypocritical?

But I digress…

I guess DubV has never been deposed or participated a Court case as an expert witness… ‘Cose rule No.1 is “Don’t cite any publications to support your point, because for every one of yours, the opposition will bring 10 that say exactly the opposite.” What an expert brings to the table (or court) is an expert opinion.

So, on a lark, I entered the keywords “Pit Bull Saves”… got 683 hits… the “PitBull DSaves”.. got 663 hits…

Some interesting links: